Why Virtual Currencies are a Potential Strategic Threat

By Julia Solomon-Strauss

Julia Solomon-Strauss is a Program Associate at the Center on Law and Security at New York University’s School of Law. Her research focuses on illicit finance, and she has written on U.S. economic statecraft and the risks posed by virtual currency.

In January, the Indonesian financial transactions agency claimed Bitcoin had been used by Islamic militants to fund terrorist activity there; last year, Salafi-jihadist groups designated by the United States as foreign terrorists were able to raise some $600 in bitcoins. These incidents raise alarms about the potential for virtual currencies to become a part of the terrorist financing toolkit.

So far, however, evidence for terrorist use of virtual currencies is anecdotal and episodic. Unlike the situation in the cybercrime context, where bitcoin is used pervasively by criminals looking to mask their identities, it is not yet a strategic counterterrorism threat. It may yet become one, though. For now, terrorist groups face important challenges in using virtual currencies at scale to fund their attacks. In particular, virtual currencies lack the convertibility that terrorist groups require to fund themselves sustainably. 

“The Cipher Brief has become the most popular outlet for former intelligence officers; no media outlet is even a close second to The Cipher Brief in terms of the number of articles published by formers.” —Sept. 2018, Studies in Intelligence, Vol. 62

Access all of The Cipher Brief’s national security-focused expert insight by becoming a Cipher Brief Subscriber+ Member.

Subscriber+


Related Articles

How Safe Would We Be Without Section 702?

SUBSCRIBER+EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW — A provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that has generated controversy around fears of the potential for abuse has proven to be crucial […] More

Search

Close