Does Adding a Label Make Us More Secure?

Posted: April 10th, 2016

By Colin McKinty

Colin McKinty, VP of Cyber Security Strategy, Americas at BAE Systems, has held various roles at the company in the both the US and UK. He moved from the company's HQ in the UK to the US in 2007 to run BAE Systems Applied Intelligence's federal business, which led to a new role: Cyber Lead for the Americas. This enabled him to focus on supporting organizations in the commercial sector. Since 2013, he has been the driving force behind BAE Applied Intelligence's success in breaking into the security market in the Americas.

When hackers recently breached the computer systems of the Bangladesh Central Bank and tried to steal nearly $1 billion from its account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, cyber security professionals gave it a now all too familiar label – that of an Advanced Persistent Threat (APT). Most of the attempted money transfer was blocked, but $81 million went missing – one of the largest cyber thefts in history.

The label was well placed as the heist had all the hallmarks of an APT. Forensics experts hired by the Bangladesh Bank indicated that attackers infiltrated the bank’s network and stole credentials for sending messages on the SWIFT international money transfer system. Following the hack, SWIFT advised the more than 3,000 global financial institutions in its network to make sure they are following recommended security practices.

Access all of The Cipher Brief’s national security-focused expert insight by becoming a Cipher Brief Subscriber+ Member.

Does Adding a Label Make Us More Secure?

By Colin McKinty

When Spymasters Talk: CIA and MI6 Chiefs On ‘Bully’ Putin and ‘Audacious’ Ukraine Raid

Why the ‘Philadelphi Corridor’ May Derail a Gaza Deal

What the U.S. Military’s ‘Overwhelming Force’ Means for the Middle East

Russia’s Poltava Attack is a Double Disaster for Ukraine

How Russia’s Military Went From Feared Power to Failing Force

Taliban 3.0: The Terrorism Threat and a Humanitarian Nightmare