The View from Beijing

By Jing Huang

Jing Huang is a Lee Foundation Professor on US-China Relations and Director of Centre on Asia and Globalization (CAG) at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) in Singapore.  Huang is on the Board of Directors of the Fujitsu-JAIMS Foundation Japan, the Board of Directors Keppel Land, the Advisory Board of the European-House Ambrosetti, the Steering Committee of the NUS Research Institute in Suzhou, and the WEF Global Agenda Council.  He also serves as a Senior Overseas Economic Analyst for China's Xinhua News Agency. Before joining the LKYSPP, Huang was a Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution (2004-2008).

The U.S. rebalance policy in the Asia-Pacific has led to a deterioration of China’s security environment, with increasing tensions in the East China Sea, including the dispute between China and Japan over the Diaoyu/Senkakus Islands, and the South China Sea, where China has territorial disputes with Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei.  The situation has provoked a fierce debate in China on how to respond.  The mainstream view in China is that the U.S. policy is to maintain the American dominance in the Asia Pacific and beyond, with some even believing the U.S. rebalance to be a covert containment of China.

From Beijing’s perspective, the rebalance policy is not just to rally the U.S. allies and win support from the other countries in the region, but it aims to gain the upper hand vis-à-vis China.  Thus, despite repeated statements that the U.S. does not take sides in territorial disputes between China and its neighboring countries, the Obama Administration has seized upon opportunities created by emerging tensions over these disputes in the East and South China Seas, and intervened under the “excuse” that the U.S. has a substantial stake in maintaining regional peace and freedom of navigation in international waters.  As a result, the U.S. effectively took the strategic initiative and put China on the defensive in its own neighborhood.

“The Cipher Brief has become the most popular outlet for former intelligence officers; no media outlet is even a close second to The Cipher Brief in terms of the number of articles published by formers.” —Sept. 2018, Studies in Intelligence, Vol. 62

Access all of The Cipher Brief’s national security-focused expert insight by becoming a Cipher Brief Subscriber+ Member.

Subscriber+


Related Articles

How Safe Would We Be Without Section 702?

SUBSCRIBER+EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW — A provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that has generated controversy around fears of the potential for abuse has proven to be crucial […] More

Search

Close