The Terror Toolbox

By Admiral James Stavridis (Ret.)

Admiral Stavridis (Ret.) was the 16th Supreme Allied Commander at NATO and 12th Dean of The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, where he earned a PhD in international affairs.  He is currently Vice Chair, Global Affairs and Managing Director at The Carlyle Group and Chair of the Board of the Rockefeller Foundation.

We are in a season of terror attacks, and the odds are high they will increase over the short term. The principle drivers will be the so-called Islamic State and its various affiliates, as well as the still-dangerous al Qaeda, which is wounded but still capable of launching attacks. Worst of all, we are likely to see more of the “inspired” attacks by self-radicalized terrorists in both the United States and Europe. Given the potential for such attacks to increase in numbers and scale, NATO has a fundamental responsibility to address terror attacks and a powerful toolbox with which to do so.

Most fundamentally, NATO stands for its values: democracy, liberty, freedom of speech, human rights, and other basic tenets of western tradition. The most powerful tool the U.S. holds, over the long term, is our adherence to what makes us true to those values. Thus, we must reject calls for torture (including water-boarding), excessive surveillance regimes that violate norms of privacy, unwarranted detention, and artificially streamlined justice systems. As tempting as it is to call for such measures in the face of barbaric actions from terrorists, we have to hold on to our values, and a value-based organization like NATO helps us do so.

“The Cipher Brief has become the most popular outlet for former intelligence officers; no media outlet is even a close second to The Cipher Brief in terms of the number of articles published by formers.” —Sept. 2018, Studies in Intelligence, Vol. 62

Access all of The Cipher Brief’s national security-focused expert insight by becoming a Cipher Brief Subscriber+ Member.

Subscriber+

Categorized as:InternationalTagged with:

Related Articles

How Safe Would We Be Without Section 702?

SUBSCRIBER+EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW — A provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that has generated controversy around fears of the potential for abuse has proven to be crucial […] More

Search

Close