Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Welcome! Log in to stay connected and make the most of your experience.

Input clean

The Debate Post-Paris

Twelve days after the Paris attacks, I was waiting for a flight at London's Heathrow Airport, which seemed to be running with its customary sedate orderliness despite Brussels being on "lockdown" and police raids still taking place in Paris and Belgium.  While checking online for the latest developments in the U.S. and EU's negotiations for a replacement for the recently struck-down Safe Harbor program, I came across a notice that, due to security concerns, a prominent international privacy professionals' organization had decided to cancel its annual European Congress scheduled to take place in Brussels beginning in late November. Notably, the cancelled congress was to have featured Max Schrems, the Austrian law student whose complaint to the Irish Data Protection Commissioner ultimately resulted in the Safe Harbor program being struck down by the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU). The irony was palpable: Privacy advocates who had celebrated the CJEU's decision that EU privacy rights trump mass surveillance-based intelligence activities were unable to gather safely in Brussels due to a state of emergency that the media, at least, were attributing, in large part, to failures of European intelligence to detect communications among terrorists that implicitly would have required some form of mass collection and analysis of personal data.

As many readers know, Schrems had complained that Facebook Ireland's transfer of his personal data to the U.S. violated his privacy rights under EU law because, once in the U.S., his data was allegedly subject to access by the National Security Agency (NSA) via PRISM.  The CJEU agreed.  The precise reasoning of the Schrems decision may seem somewhat opaque to U.S. readers, however, because it is rooted in notions of "fundamental rights" under the EU's Charter of Human Rights and prior case law elaborating limits on how such rights can be restricted.  Privacy is one of the fundamental rights under the Charter.  

Keep reading...Show less
Access all of The Cipher Brief’s national security-focused expert insight by becoming a Cipher Brief Subscriber+ Member.

Related Articles

Report for Wednesday, June 18, 2025

9:04 America/New York Wednesday, June 18 [...] More

Why Iran’s Nuclear Program Cannot Be Dismantled from the Air

OPINION — As Israel launches one of the most expansive covert-kinetic operations in recent memory against Iranian nuclear infrastructure, a critical [...] More

Israel’s Bid to End the Iranian Nuclear Threat

OPINION — In the early hours of June 13, Israel launched a series of airstrikes, codenamed Operation Rising Lion, targeting Iranian nuclear [...] More

Report for Tuesday, June 17, 2025

9:15 AM America/New York Tuesday, June 17 [...] More

Women Who Weaponized Words in World War II

BOOK REVIEW: Propaganda Girls: The Secret War of the Women of the OSSBy Lisa Rogak / St. Martin’s PressReviewed by: Tammy Kupperman ThorpThe Reviewer [...] More

What’s Happening in L.A. May Not Stay in L.A.

OPINION / COLUMN -- “At this early stage of the proceedings, the Court [for the Northern District of California] must determine whether the President [...] More

South Korea’s New President

OPINION — On June 3rd South Korea turned the page and is embarked on a journey of peace and prosperity. Lee Jae-Myung handily won the presidential [...] More

Report for Monday, June 16, 2025

7:38 AM America/New_York Monday, June 16 [...] More

The Houthi Balancing Act After Israel’s Attack on Iran

OPINION — How will the Houthis respond to the devastating Israeli strikes on Iran? This moment could prove decisive for both the Iran-led axis and [...] More