U.S. Shows Allies & Opponents: We Are Willing to Use Force

By Admiral James Stavridis (Ret.)

Admiral Stavridis (Ret.) was the 16th Supreme Allied Commander at NATO and 12th Dean of The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, where he earned a PhD in international affairs.  He is currently Vice Chair, Global Affairs and Managing Director at The Carlyle Group and Chair of the Board of the Rockefeller Foundation.

U.S. President Donald Trump, in a filmed statement from his Mar-a-lago resort Thursday night – where he is currently meeting President Xi – said the strike was “in [the] vital national security interest of the U.S.,” adding that “years of previous attempts at changing Assad’s behavior have all failed.” The Syrian army has said that the strike killed six Syrian soldiers, and claimed that the attack made Washington a “partner” to “terrorist groups.” A spokesman for the Russian government, Dmitry Peskov, also denounced the attack as unprovoked “aggression against a sovereign nation,” and the Kremlin has suspended its air safety agreement with the U.S. in retaliation. Other countries, including the United Kingdom, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Australia have supported the strike.

Thursday night’s attack represents a striking about face for the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump. Just one week ago, administration officials seemed ready to abandon the idea of regime change in Syria, a longstanding Obama Administration policy. On Friday, White House Press Secretary, Sean Spicer, stated that the Trump administration “accepts the political reality” of Assad’s rule, while Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, observed vaguely that Assad’s fate would be “decided by the Syrian people.” Now, the Trump administration has taken the most significant U.S. military action against Assad since the Syrian civil war started six years ago.

“The Cipher Brief has become the most popular outlet for former intelligence officers; no media outlet is even a close second to The Cipher Brief in terms of the number of articles published by formers.” —Sept. 2018, Studies in Intelligence, Vol. 62

Access all of The Cipher Brief’s national security-focused expert insight by becoming a Cipher Brief Subscriber+ Member.

Subscriber+

Categorized as:InternationalTagged with:

Related Articles

How Safe Would We Be Without Section 702?

SUBSCRIBER+EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW — A provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that has generated controversy around fears of the potential for abuse has proven to be crucial […] More

Search

Close