Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Welcome! Log in to stay connected and make the most of your experience.

Input clean

Facebook Blowback

Facebook announced on Friday that as many as 50 million of the platform’s social media accounts had been hacked giving attackers access to user’s personal information.  As some call for greater oversight and regulation, the company is already facing potentially stiff fines in Europe.   

Cipher Brief Expert and former Deputy Director, U.S. Cyber Command, Kevin McLaughlin offers the following things to consider:


While people are reacting strongly to this breach, it’s worth remembering that the 2015 Office of Personnel Management (OPM) breach compromised the personal and private data that was collected from background investigations of millions of people, to include not only their PII data, but sensitive data on medical, legal, and other areas that are contained in background investigations.  So compromises of large volumes of data containing our personal information is not a new thing.

That said, large social media and tech companies like FB, Twitter, and Google not only have PII on their users, but might have much deeper insights on their users that if compromised, could open them to more than just identity theft, but to more sophisticated threats such as blackmail, personal reputation attacks, as well.

Imagine how Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s yearbook and calendar are being used in the confirmation process and then think about how a nation-state, criminal group, or political group could use years of private social media, email, web surfing history, location data, etc. against an enemy.  The data they collect, analyze, and use is already under scrutiny, but now we need to worry about whether its very existence in a single repository is a new problem to manage.

One thing to consider is whether there should be more independent oversight and management of these companies.  Each is very private about their own internal software, tools, and security practices and each thinks their “stuff” is the best.  Some independence, whether through regulatory pressures from the government, or forcing them to have independent security audits by objective third parties (similar to how accounting firm independence is often required) might be worth considering.

Related Articles

Chinese Industrial Espionage: What Happens in the Netherlands Doesn’t Stay in the Netherlands

OPINION — China is conducting intelligence operations in the Netherlands that are targeting key industrial sectors including semiconductors, [...] More
China’s ‘Leap Forward’ in Drone Weapons

China’s ‘Leap Forward’ in Drone Weapons

DEEP DIVE – China’s military is in the midst of an innovation and manufacturing boom in drone weaponry — a “leap forward,” as one expert put it, that [...] More
The Trump AI Deals in the Gulf: Measuring the Value Against the Security Concerns

The Trump AI Deals in the Gulf: Measuring the Value Against the Security Concerns

EXPERT INTERVIEWS – When the White House announced multibillion-dollar artificial intelligence deals with the UAE and Saudi Arabia earlier this [...] More

Ukraine is a Crucible of Innovation, Not a Perfect Blueprint

EXPERT PERSPECTIVE – Ukrainian technology expositions are abuzz with enterprise and excitement. I have watched unmanned systems glide through [...] More

Counter-AI May be the Most Important AI Battlefront

EXPERT PERSPECTIVE — Artificial intelligence (AI) has truly captivated the American imagination, with increasing attention focused on the latest AI [...] More

How the U.S. is Tapping a Much Bigger Well in The Middle East

EXPERT DEEP DIVE – President Donald Trump’s first official trip to the Middle East during his current administration may have tapped a well that runs [...] More