On Putin’s “Victory Day,” A Warning To the West
SUBSCRIBER+ EXCLUSIVE REPORTING — It’s an unusually busy week in Moscow. Russian President Vladimir Putin has been inaugurated for a fifth term, the military is […] More
OPINION — In February 2023, the Biden Administration rapidly declassified intelligence related to China’s aerial intelligence collection activities to counter Beijing’s false claims that a Chinese spy balloon, shot down after a public flight across part of the United States, was merely collecting weather data. One year earlier, the administration had also declassified intelligence that unearthed Russia’s deception about its plans to invade Ukraine. These two instances have given democracy a sudden advantage in its escalating narrative dogfight with authoritarianism. Providing a glimmer of hope against the last 16 years of declining civil rights and liberties worldwide, this advantage suggests the United States intelligence community can play a critical role in support of global democracy.
Democracy wins by sharing information; authoritarianism wins by quelling it. In the weeks preceding Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, conventional measures of warfare and wisdom suggested that Putin and authoritarianism held the upper hand as Russian forces and capabilities outnumbered Ukraine’s by rather compelling arithmetic. But the United States adopted decidedly unconventional methods of warfare, declassifying and disclosing intelligence about Russia’s movement of Special Forces towards Ukraine’s borders, construction of hospitals stocked with blood supplies, and creation of fake videos as part of a false flag campaign to conceal Russia’s true intentions. The Russian advantage was negated: Putin could no longer invade Ukraine under the pretext that Ukraine was the aggressor, and this meant that other countries— particularly NATO countries — couldn’t ignore Ukraine’s plight.
Judiciously declassifying intelligence can neutralize opponents of democracy by using objective truth to counter fabricated disinformation and to dispute the post-truths that are increasingly associated with authoritarian regimes. Objective truths are facts or realities that exist independently of individual perspectives or beliefs. Post-truth, according to the Oxford dictionary, which chose it as the word of the year in 2016, is “relating to circumstances in which people respond more to feelings and beliefs than to facts.” Scholars such as Cunha, Levy, McIntyre, and Snyder suggest that post-truth fuels authoritarianism, which seeks to erode a shared reality, increasing people’s susceptibility to divisiveness and exploitation. Defending the difference between truth and lies is defending the free will to choose reality over political manipulation.
It is important to remember that humans have always relied much more heavily on emotions for decision-making — as much as 90% of the time. The difference in the post-truth world is the blatant disregard for fact, or any need to subscribe to it. Authoritarian regimes used to care about window-dressing oppressive rule to mimic democracy. Most go through some pretense of holding elections, however rigged, and maintaining institutions, however corrupt. But as distrust in democracy and the manipulation of information enables authoritarianism to thrive, pretending matters less and less.
Looking for a way to get ahead of the week in cyber and tech? Sign up for the Cyber Initiatives Group Sunday newsletter to quickly get up to speed on the biggest cyber and tech headlines and be ready for the week ahead. Sign up today.
The decision to declassify information must balance national security interests, protect sensitive information, and promote transparency and accountability. Such transparency does not include unauthorized disclosures, like that of Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning or — most recently — Jack Teixeira, who was arrested on April 13th for posting classified documents on social media website Discord. The IC has historically operated on a “demand” basis, revealing its intelligence secrets reluctantly, reactively, and in the face of pressure by parts of the U.S. government, the media, or the public. But this can change. Our democracy depends not just on an open dialogue between the IC and the American public, but also on the national security enterprise’s willingness to fold in private industry and outside experts as part of the security equation. There may come a time that the IC’s secrecy bias places our nation’s security in jeopardy, and it may come sooner than we’re prepared for.
There’s a 400 million-page backlog of documents waiting to be declassified, and the classification system itself costs more than $18 billion a year. We can avoid adding to that backlog by determining what information shouldn’t be classified in the first place — and there’s plenty of it, much of which already has precedent.
The U.S. Intelligence Community is uniquely situated to defend global democracy against authoritarianism. No other entity, private or otherwise, can lay claim to both its objectivity and analytic depth and rigor. But it doesn’t have to stop there. The precedents above suggest that the American people would be the greatest beneficiaries of a national security system truly built with them in mind.
The Cipher Brief is committed to publishing a range of perspectives on national security issues submitted by deeply experienced national security professionals.
Opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent the views or opinions of The Cipher Brief.
Have a perspective to share based on your experience in the national security field? Send it to [email protected] for publication consideration.
Read more expert-driven national security insights, perspectives and analysis in The Cipher Brief because National Security is Everyone’s Business
Related Articles
SUBSCRIBER+ EXCLUSIVE REPORTING — It’s an unusually busy week in Moscow. Russian President Vladimir Putin has been inaugurated for a fifth term, the military is […] More
SUBSCRIBER+ EXCLUSIVE REPORTING — In late March, hunkered in his sandbag-lined compound with visiting Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky pleaded for […] More
SUBSCRIBER+ EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW — Last week The Cipher Brief published a look at the threat to the nation’s water supply posed by cyberattacks – an […] More
SUBSCRIBER+EXCLUSIVE ANALYSIS — While top cybersecurity officials sound the alarm over intrusions by Russia, China and individual hackers into U.S. critical infrastructure, they’ve noticed another […] More
SUBSCRIBER+EXCLUSIVE REPORTING — The last Afghan head of intelligence before the 2021 Taliban takeover of Afghanistan believes terrorist groups have regained a foothold in the […] More
SUBSCRIBER+EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW — Russia’s relentless assault on Ukraine has forced a revival of Ukraine’s domestic defense industry. Ukraine tripled defense production in 2023, the first full […] More
Search