The ‘New Middle East’ That Awaits Donald Trump
EXPERT INTERVIEW — Less than two months before the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 47th U.S. president, the headlines from the Middle East are […] More
Bottom Line Up Front
In 2011, Congress sought to reduce Iran’s exportation of oil by passing a law, which was ultimately enacted, that imposes penalties for transactions with Iran’s Central Bank, the entity in control of Iran’s oil payments. That law, Section 1245 of the FY2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), requires the President to exclude a foreign bank from the U.S. financial system if that bank conducts a ‘significant financial transaction’ with Iran’s Central Bank or with any sanctioned Iranian bank. The law provided an incentive to cut purchases of Iranian oil by providing for an exception for the banks of any country determined to have ‘significantly reduced’ purchases of Iranian oil. The exception, called the Significant Reduction Exception (SRE) requires countries to reduce their oil purchases from Iran by at least 20% each 180-day evaluation period. The mechanism largely accomplished its objective from the enactment until the lifting of sanctions in early 2016 under the Iran nuclear deal. During that time, Iran’s oil exports fell from 2.5 million barrels per day (mbd) to 1.1 mbd, greatly reducing Iran’s receipts of hard currency. The lifting of U.S. sanctions in January 2016 had a predictable effect: Iran’s oil exports rebounded to the former 2.5 mbd level by the end of that year.
The May 2018 Trump administration decision to exit the nuclear deal, and the resulting re-imposition of U.S. sanctions, shortened the life expectancy for the SRE allowances. Amid a tightening oil market, the Administration provided the SRE to eight countries on November 5, 2018: China, India, Turkey, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Greece, and Italy. Of those, Taiwan, Greece, and Italy reduced their Iran oil purchases to zero, but the five others – despite reductions – continued to collectively keep Iran’s total oil sales over 1 mbd – a number judged inconsistent with the Administration’s ‘maximum pressure’ campaign against the Iranian regime.
On April 22, 2019, the State Department announced that no more SREs would be granted after their expiration on May 2, 2019. China, Turkey, and to a lesser extent India, had strongly urged renewal of the SREs and are likely to try to continue at least some purchases of Iranian oil. Whether they do so will depend on whether the Trump administration imposes any actual sanctions on the banks of these countries, and on the willingness of these countries to risk U.S. sanctions. Japan and South Korea, which typically always cooperate with U.S. laws, will likely cease energy transactions with Iran, as will the other countries that already ceased purchasing Iranian oil. But it is unlikely that, in the aggregate, the U.S. move will drive Iran’s oil exports to zero, as the Administration predicts. The decision will surely reduce Iran’s exports below the approximately 1.2 mbd level they hovered around at the end of March, however.
The U.S. announcement follows by two weeks the U.S. designation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a foreign terrorist organization. Whether the decision about the SREs affects Iran’s oil sales drastically or marginally, the U.S. decision will likely further inflame tensions between Tehran and Washington. Iran’s state news media indicated that Iran would be able to circumvent the decision and to continue exporting oil, suggesting Iran did not want to use the SRE decision to escalate its disputes with the United States. However, the head of the IRGC Navy, Admiral Alireza Tangsiri, reiterated a previous threat to close the Strait of Hormuz if the end of the SRE allowances ‘prevent Iran from using it….’ And, this latest move gives Iran’s hardliners more ammunition to argue that Iran derives no economic benefit from remaining in the nuclear deal and that Iran needs to abandon the agreement once and for all.
Related Articles
EXPERT INTERVIEW — Less than two months before the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 47th U.S. president, the headlines from the Middle East are […] More
DEEP DIVE — For years, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has tried and failed at all sorts of half-baked schemes to eliminate enemies living in […] More
DEEP DIVE — It may be the most consequential change to the Middle East since the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks against Israel, and the wars […] More
DEEP DIVE — The Middle East has changed dramatically since President Donald Trump left office in 2021. An always-tense part of the world has seen an […] More
EXPERT PERSPECTIVES — In the hours after Donald Trump was declared the winner of the 2024 presidential election, we turned to our network of experts for […] More
DEEP DIVE — It was, as Axios reporter Zachary Basu put it, “the most astonishing, gravity-defying comeback in the history of American politics.” But Donald Trump’s […] More
Search