Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

NatSecEDGE

Welcome! Log in to stay connected and make the most of your experience.

Input clean

Dead Drop: May 11

<p>dead drop</p>

HASPEL HEARING HIGHLIGHTS: Here are a few quirky things we noticed or heard from others regarding Gina Haspel’s confirmation hearing this week:  The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) members must like living in the past.  By our count, there were about 60 questions thrown at Haspel about CIA interrogation techniques (which have been verboten since 2009) or the destruction of videotapes (which were shredded in 2005.)  We know those subjects are important to a lot of people but c’mon. There were less than a dozen questions about anything else.  Zero questions on Iran’s compliance with the JCPOA which was in the news the day before.  No questions on North Korea or Syria? Just one (yes or no) question on Russia? Here are some other observations from the hearing.  Senator Dianne Feinstein’s staff didn’t distinguish themselves.  Somehow, they let the Senator read a prepared question to Haspel about something in former CIA Acting General Counsel John Rizzo’s book – without knowing that Rizzo had very publicly corrected mis-impressions from that account about ten days before. And Feinstein said something about the destroyed videotapes having images of the interrogation of “92 detainees.”  Haspel had to correct the Senator by saying – no, it was 92 tapes about one detainee.  We’ll give DiFi a pass for referring to Rizzo as the Agency’s “Consul General” – because we have trouble keeping all those titles straight too.

MISSING GRACE NOTES: We understand that some folks at Langley noted that Haspel’s opening statement which described the skill and courage of Agency clandestine service officers – failed to stroke the expertise of CIA analysts, tech wizards, or support officers. Usually, in public comments it is wise for senior Agency officials to give a shout out to all the major disciplines in the CIA structure.  Haspel did, however, say nice stuff about Agency analysts during her Q&A.

Keep reading...Show less
Access all of The Cipher Brief’s national security-focused expert insight by becoming a Cipher Brief Subscriber+ Member.