RISING TO THE DEFENSE: Some CIA watchers couldn’t help but notice that agency director Mike Pompeo was among a small group of administration officials sent out to defend the president’s mental acuity recently. Pompeo appeared on CBS News’ Face the Nation and Fox News Channel’s Fox News Sunday on the same day. While the CIA director fielded questions on threats ranging from North Korea to Iran, the initial questions on both shows, not surprisingly, focused on Trump’s fitness for his job. Pompeo, also not unexpectedly, leapt to POTUS’s defense, saying Trump is “completely fit” for office. While that was likely music to the president’s ear, Trump might not have agreed with another assessment from Pompeo who, in response to a question, denied that there is any “deep state” at CIA and that he can’t believe there ever was. Observers noticed that he also was at Camp David over the weekend as the president met with Cabinet officials to discuss the upcoming legislative agenda. Some observers have questioned whether Pompeo steps beyond the role of intelligence adviser and provides policy and political advice as well. Also noteworthy was that Pompeo’s nominal boss, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, didn’t seem to be on the Camp David guest list.
WELL THAT SETTLES IT: According to Radio Free Europe, Russian officials have rejected comments made by CIA Director Pompeo that Russia is attempting to interfere with the 2018 congressional elections and have been messing with the U.S. electoral process “for decades.” “We have not meddled and will never meddle into the domestic affairs of other countries, ” Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said. This will come as welcome news to the Ukrainians, among others.
DEEP HONOR: President Trump took a break from talking about the ‘deep state’ last week to present one of the national security community’s highest honors to former NSA Deputy Director Rick Ledgett. Our own spies tell us that Ledgett, (a Cipher Brief Expert, of course!) received the National Security Medal during a private ceremony in the Oval Office. Not a bad way to cap an almost 30-year career at the NSA.
Ledgett’s former colleagues sang his praises Wednesday, although some said there was an inherent awkwardness in Trump paying tribute to a career intelligence official while routinely taking shots at the spy agency workforce, dismissing their conclusions on issues like Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election, and accusing them of political bias.
GOOD HELP IS HARD TO FIND: Muckrock.com has published a bunch of historical documents that ask (but don’t answer) the question: Why was Richard Nixon’s job application turned down by the FBI in 1937? Nixon had just graduated third in his class at Duke Law School and apparently fancied himself a G-man. The documents include a report of a personal interview Nixon had with a special agent who concluded that the young man was neat, had “ordinary” features, was not nervous and “perhaps” had executive ability. Apparently, a couple decades later, J. Edgar Hoover tried to find out why Nixon was not the one for the FBI in ‘37 – but did not come up with a satisfactory answer. There were some hints that a potential appointment to the bureau was scuttled when Congress failed to appropriate enough funds to bring on sufficient additional staff in the late 1930’s.
LEAKS ABOUT LEAKS? The Hill reports that Republican-led congressional investigators are looking into whether senior FBI officials improperly leaked information to the news media during the 2016 election. The Hill quotes from text messages exchanged between FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok and bureau lawyer Lisa Page. The text messages “which were reviewed by The Hill” (was this a leak?) suggest that Strzok and Page knew about certain articles in The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post and other news outlets before they were published. Our favorite part of the story has the two FBI folks, for unclear reasons, trying to track down information and a photo on New York Times reporter Matt Apuzzo. Strzok describes Apuzzo as “TOTALLY schlubby” – which, no doubt, is a technical surveillance term used at the FBI – and which Apuzzo is likely to print out and frame for posterity.
POCKET LITTER: Bits and pieces of interesting/weird stuff we discovered:
NETWORK NEWS: Not a day goes by when members of The Cipher Brief Network aren’t making news. Here are just a few examples from this week:
WHAT’S ON THEIR NIGHTSTAND?
One excellent book I recently received is FUTURE WAR by Robert H. Latiff. I wrote a book jacket endorsement for it: “A thoughtful and thought-provoking book that addresses a range of political and sociological issues beyond what the title Future War infers. It comports with the highest tradition of ‘truth to power.’ A compelling book.” —Honorable James R. Clapper, former U.S. Director of National Intelligence
SECURITY QUOTE OF THE WEEK:
“There is an old saying that chaos generally generates more intelligence than it retards, and I mean that in a metaphorical sense. It generally stimulates communication and activity, and therefore the thoughtful intelligence collector is likely to get more from it than not. But you would have to be agile and on the front balls of your feet, which is why if you are sitting on a source over a long period of time, you prefer stability and say, ‘Nobody mess with the environment here, because I have this stable, reliable and enduring source.’ But increasingly, that is not the nature of the world…In general, more noise generates more intelligence.” – Chris Ingles, quoted in Cyber Vigilantes & Hacktivists: Double-Edged Sword Against ISIS
IF YOU SEE SOMETHING, SAY SOMETHING: Got any tips for your friendly neighborhood Dead Drop? Shoot us a note at [email protected] or [email protected].
Search