Sanctions on North Korea: The Devil is in China’s Follow-Through

By Soo Kim

Soo Kim is a former CIA intelligence analyst and linguist, specializing in East Asia, propaganda, and leadership studies. She was recently a fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. 

If there was one way to emphasize the grave problem of nuclear security to the international community, South Korean President Park Geun-hye’s recent visit to Washington summed up the issue pretty well. On the fringes of the Nuclear Security Summit (NSS), Park met with President Barack Obama and the leaders of Japan and China to discuss the region’s response to the present and palpable threat of North Korea’s nuclear weapons program. Park’s participation in the NSS and conversations with her regional neighbors on dealing with Pyongyang’s ever-present nuclear threat symbolically underscored the exigency of finding a unified strategy to deal with nuclear threats.

The outcome of the meetings? At the theoretical, symbolic level, all parties endorsed South Korea’s position on the perennial problem of North Korea’s nuclear provocations, rebuked Pyongyang’s course of action in recent months – its  January hydrogen bomb test, followed by several missile launches – and expressed support for UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 2270 imposing sanctions against the Kim regime. Both President Obama and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe called for the global community to faithfully implement the resolution and reaffirmed bilateral and three-way cooperation on the common North Korean threat. Washington maintained its security commitment guarantee on the Peninsula and backed Seoul’s efforts to deter Pyongyang’s bad behavior. Tokyo, too, put aside longstanding territorial and historical disagreements with Seoul to promote concrete security and defense cooperation among the three nations.

“The Cipher Brief has become the most popular outlet for former intelligence officers; no media outlet is even a close second to The Cipher Brief in terms of the number of articles published by formers.” —Sept. 2018, Studies in Intelligence, Vol. 62

Access all of The Cipher Brief’s national security-focused expert insight by becoming a Cipher Brief Subscriber+ Member.

Subscriber+

Categorized as:InternationalTagged with:

Related Articles

How Safe Would We Be Without Section 702?

SUBSCRIBER+EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW — A provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that has generated controversy around fears of the potential for abuse has proven to be crucial […] More

Search

Close