After Israel’s Retaliation Against Iran, What Comes Next?
SUBSCRIBER+ EXCLUSIVE REPORTING — For nearly a week, the Middle East and much of the world were on a knife’s edge, waiting for a promised […] More
Bottom Line Up Front
The April 21, 2019, terrorist attacks against several Sri Lanka churches and hotels were the deadliest in the history of Sri Lanka, a country that has suffered greatly from decades of civil war and ethnic conflict. The Easter bombings also set in motion a chain of reprisal killings in which angry mobs from the Buddhist majority attacked Muslims and destroyed their property. The terrorists responsible for the April attacks, in which hundreds of people were killed, were Muslims and inspired by the violent ideology of ‘bin Ladenism’ espoused by groups like al-Qaeda and the so-called Islamic State. The attacks exacerbated religious and ethnic tensions destabilizing the country as the government struggles to contain the violence and formulate an effective response.
Sri Lanka has a painful recent history of ethnic and religiously-driven violence; there are no signs this recent wave will crest anytime soon. The terrorists were part of a local terrorist group, National Tawheed Jamath (NTJ), though connections to transnational terrorist organizations like the Islamic State have been uncovered. The reprisals were swift and brutal. In the weeks after the attacks, there has been a disturbing surge in the scale and intensity of violence directed toward Sri Lanka’s Muslim community.
In western Sri Lanka, mobs used gasoline bombs to burn more than 500 shops, houses and places of worship in a single day. In some cases, the violence was organized, with attackers being transported to certain villages and towns where local Buddhists then directed them toward the homes of Muslims or Muslim-owned businesses. There are images and reports of Muslims being beaten, often while security officials fail to intervene, and with individuals celebrating the savagery. Some reporting has suggested that mobs marauded through the streets for hours without any response from the government or security forces, which eventually imposed a curfew, although not before much of the damage was already inflicted.
Collective punishment and blame are far too common in the immediate aftermath of ethnically and religiously motivated violence. The ideology of ‘bin Ladenism’ is fueled in large part by a persecution narrative, which reprisal attacks and draconian legislation targeting a religion only serve to reinforce. Groups like the Islamic State are transparent in their intention to divide society, supporting the notion that violence is the only option to achieve their objectives. With each tit-for-tat response, tensions mount among the population and the damage to social cohesion becomes even more challenging to address in the long-term. Escalating sectarian violence plays directly into the narrative pushed by extremists on all sides, both locally and at a transnational level.
Related Articles
SUBSCRIBER+ EXCLUSIVE REPORTING — For nearly a week, the Middle East and much of the world were on a knife’s edge, waiting for a promised […] More
BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT – Less than one week after Iran’s attack against Israel, Israel struck Iran early on Friday, hitting a military air base […] More
SUBSCRIBER+EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW — While Ukraine deals with shortages of troops, munitions, and equipment for its air defenses, some Ukrainians are teaming up with foreign investors […] More
SUBSCRIBER+EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW — With a mere 1.2 million citizens, Estonia is among NATO’s smallest members, but its contributions to Ukraine have led the pack by […] More
SUBSCRIBER+EXCLUSIVE BRIEFING — Drone weapons are part of the daily narrative of the war in Ukraine – from Russia’s use of Iranian drones against infrastructure […] More
SUBSCRIBER+ EXCLUSIVE ANALYSIS — Iran’s retaliatory strikes against Israel this weekend were both a potentially game-changing, historic first — and an underwhelming response. Historic, because […] More
Search