If I Were Questioning Brett Kavanaugh

| Walter Pincus
Walter Pincus
Columnist, The Cipher Brief

Brett M. Kavanaugh ought to be questioned on how a President, alleged to have violated a federal criminal law – say conspiring to violate the Federal Election Laws – could be investigated based on the views he promoted in his 2009 article, “Separation of Powers During the Forty-Fourth Presidency and Beyond,” published in the Minnesota Law Review.

In that article, Kavanaugh said, “Congress might consider a law exempting a President—while in office—from criminal prosecution and investigation, including from questioning by criminal prosecutors or defense counsel.”

You can read the rest of this Fine Print column, and all of The Cipher Brief’s expert content, by signing up to become a Cipher Brief Member.  Joining this high-level, security-focused community is only $10/month (for an annual $120/yr membership).

Cipher Brief Members engage in high-level conversations about national and global security issues every day. If you’re not already a member, you should be.

If you are experiencing any issues with signing up or signing in, please drop an email to support@thecipherbrief.com.

We look forward to welcoming you to the community!

The Author is Walter Pincus

Walter Pincus is a Columnist and the Senior National Security Reporter at The Cipher Brief. He spent forty years at The Washington Post, writing on topics from nuclear weapons to politics.  In 2002, he and a team of Post reporters won the Pulitzer Prize for national reporting. He also won an Emmy in 1981 and the 2010 Arthur Ross Award from the American Academy for Diplomacy.  He can be reached at wpincus@thecipherbrief.com.

Learn more about The Cipher Brief's Network here.