How Terrorism’s Titanic Egos Help Our National Security

By Aki Peritz

Aki Peritz is a former counterterrorism analyst and coauthor of Find Fix Finish: Inside the Counterterrorism Campaigns that Killed bin Laden & Devastated Al Qaeda.  He recently worked at Harvard University's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and at Third Way.

Like a divorced couple in a bitter custody battle, al Qaeda and the Islamic State’s (ISIS) leaders can’t help but to denounce each other in the ugliest of terms. In the latest salvo, AQ chief Ayman al-Zawahiri said earlier this month ISIS’ leaders are “officers…of Saddam” and anyone who swears allegiance to its leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, “must know that he’s a partner in all his crimes.”

This latest rhetorical skirmish—derisively calling ISIS personnel ex-Baathists—indicates real, deep-seated animosity. It further underscores the lack of unity among the two largest transnational Sunni terror groups on the planet. This is especially odd, since these groups have generally similar goals and outlook. So why haven’t they—in all their forms and iterations over the last few years—buried the hatchet and merged to create one terror mega-organization?

“The Cipher Brief has become the most popular outlet for former intelligence officers; no media outlet is even a close second to The Cipher Brief in terms of the number of articles published by formers.” —Sept. 2018, Studies in Intelligence, Vol. 62

Access all of The Cipher Brief’s national security-focused expert insight by becoming a Cipher Brief Subscriber+ Member.

Subscriber+

Categorized as:InternationalTagged with:

Related Articles

How Safe Would We Be Without Section 702?

SUBSCRIBER+EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW — A provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that has generated controversy around fears of the potential for abuse has proven to be crucial […] More

Search

Close