NATO’s Future – Grim or Hopeful?

By Brigadier Genergal (ret.) Jarosław Stróżyk

Brigadier Genergal (ret.) Jarosław Stróżyk served as Poland's Defense Attaché for the Army, Navy and Air in Washington, D.C., (2013-2016) and Deputy Director of the Intelligence Division, International Military Staff, NATO (2010 - 2013). He is a senior fellow at the new Polish think tank Stratpoints.

Poland and other countries in the region – particularly NATO members located on Europe’s eastern flank – look to the new American administration with both anxiety and hope. During the election campaign, President-elect Donald Trump sent mixed messages about NATO and his willingness to maintain the same level of U.S. engagement in Europe. The anxiety comes with Trump’s calling the NATO alliance “obsolete” and his campaign promise to defend NATO allies only if they meet their obligations. Understanding that campaign rhetoric has its own set of rules, and is not necessarily what actual policy will look like, is the sole glimmer of hope for NATO’s future.

NATO still needs U.S. diplomatic engagement and military resources. I tend to believe that the 45th U.S. President will address as soon as possible the long-standing concern about European burden-sharing, probably long before the 2017 NATO Summit at the new NATO Headquarters in Brussels. Based upon candidate and President-elect Trump’s social media activity, I easily envisage that the 2 percent of GDP on defense spending and other tangible thresholds will be tweeted about in the upcoming days and weeks.

“The Cipher Brief has become the most popular outlet for former intelligence officers; no media outlet is even a close second to The Cipher Brief in terms of the number of articles published by formers.” —Sept. 2018, Studies in Intelligence, Vol. 62

Access all of The Cipher Brief’s national security-focused expert insight by becoming a Cipher Brief Subscriber+ Member.

Subscriber+

Categorized as:InternationalTagged with:

Related Articles

How Safe Would We Be Without Section 702?

SUBSCRIBER+EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW — A provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that has generated controversy around fears of the potential for abuse has proven to be crucial […] More

Search

Close