Superficially Normal

By Daniel Markey

Daniel Markey is a Senior Research Professor and Academic Director of the Global Policy Program at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.  He is the author of China’s Western Horizon:  Beijing and the New Geopolitics of Eurasia

Several years ago, relations between Pakistan and the United States hit a post-9/11 low. The 2011 discovery of Osama bin Laden’s compound not far from Pakistan’s premier military academy left Americans seething and suspicious. For their part, Pakistanis fulminated over a series of American “violations” of their territorial sovereignty by stealth helicopter, armed drones, and CIA contractors.

But tempers gradually cooled, and both sides recognized that narrow cooperation would suit their purposes better than none at all. Since then, Washington and Islamabad have chosen to focus on areas of agreement, such as the security threat posed to Pakistan by homegrown terrorists, rather than to rehash their many differences. This has produced superficially normal patterns of diplomatic and military cooperation. Pakistan reopened supply routes into Afghanistan, U.S. aid resumed its flow to Pakistan’s military and civilian institutions, and public criticism—by either side—has generally been kept to a minimum.

“The Cipher Brief has become the most popular outlet for former intelligence officers; no media outlet is even a close second to The Cipher Brief in terms of the number of articles published by formers.” —Sept. 2018, Studies in Intelligence, Vol. 62

Access all of The Cipher Brief’s national security-focused expert insight by becoming a Cipher Brief Subscriber+ Member.

Subscriber+

Categorized as:InternationalTagged with:

Related Articles

How Safe Would We Be Without Section 702?

SUBSCRIBER+EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW — A provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that has generated controversy around fears of the potential for abuse has proven to be crucial […] More

Search

Close